UABDivulga - Barcelona recerca i innovació

In this article, we explore how advertising and innovation interact within firms, affecting both individual performance and broader economic outcomes. We investigate the economic consequences of firms shifting their resources toward advertising, which leads to short-term gains, rather than investing in innovation, which drives long-term growth and productivity.

Our central argument is that advertising and innovation are often competing strategies for firms, and when too much emphasis is placed on advertising, innovation tends to suffer. While advertising can help firms boost visibility and increase immediate sales, it does not create lasting value or contribute to technological progress. In contrast, innovation leads to the creation of new products, improvements in quality, and enhanced productivity, all of which are crucial for sustained economic growth.

We develop a theoretical model to explore this dynamic, highlighting the trade-off that firms face when allocating resources. In the model, both advertising and innovation exhibit diminishing returns, meaning that each additional euro spent yields smaller benefits. Advertising, especially when it becomes more cost-effective due to digital technologies and platforms, encourages firms to focus more on immediate visibility and consumer attention. This shift comes at the expense of innovation, as firms allocate fewer resources to research and development (R&D) and product improvement.

Moreover, the paper identifies a significant problem with this behavior: advertising leads to market concentration. Larger firms with more resources can dominate advertising, gaining a disproportionate share of the market, while smaller, potentially more innovative firms struggle to compete. This reduces overall competition and stifles innovation, as dominant firms are incentivized to rely on advertising to maintain their market position, rather than focusing on improving products or developing new technologies.

We distinguish between two types of economic efficiency: static and dynamic. Static efficiency refers to the optimal allocation of resources at a given time, whereas dynamic efficiency concerns the ability of an economy to grow and innovate over time. Advertising can enhance static efficiency by directing resources toward the most valuable products, but it harms dynamic efficiency by discouraging long-term investment in innovation. We argue that this imbalance leads to a less competitive market and slower technological progress, ultimately hindering economic growth.

As a solution to this issue, we propose policy interventions to rebalance the emphasis on advertising and innovation. One potential solution is the introduction of an advertising tax, which would make advertising less attractive relative to investment in innovation. The revenue generated from this tax could then be used to fund R&D programs or provide subsidies for firms focused on technological development. Additionally, we suggest that governments could offer tax incentives or direct grants to encourage firms to invest in innovation.

In conclusion, our work warns against an overreliance on advertising as a strategy for business growth. While advertising can provide short-term success, it is innovation that drives long-term prosperity. By incentivizing innovation and introducing policies that correct the current imbalance, economies can achieve more sustainable growth and foster an environment where both firms and consumers benefit from continuous technological advancements.